beepboard

0.8

You're not logged in.

INCREDIBLY UNSTABLE ISOTOPE
by chikennugies · 2025-12-29 · song #489 · remix of #33

made as a part of Beepbox Secret Santa 2025

6

51

107

Comments

Nisheshagua 99

2025-12-29 · comment #407

nuts

UnbihexiumFan

2025-12-29 · comment #412

Awesome song!

minty

2025-12-29 · comment #414

crazyCRazy! I love it!

UnbihexiumFan

2025-12-29 · comment #415

I prefer stable isotopes tho, it's much easier to observe their chemistry, since they live longer and therefore there is more time for them to react with other compounds. This is why uranium chemistry is quite well-known despite its radioactive, but oganesson chemistry...

I promise I think about things that aren't chemistry!! Trust me!!

minty

2025-12-30 · comment #416

BUT unstable isotopes kaboom tho

UnbihexiumFan

2026-01-04 · comment #502

erm, actually, unstable isotopes only go kaboom when they reach what is called their critical mass. To sustain a chain reaction of atoms kabooming causing other atoms kabooming, there needs to be enough energy from the kabooming atoms, as any less than that will mean that each atom's energy will on average cause less than one atom to kaboom, and the reaction "fizzles out". For most radioactive isotopes, it is very difficult to reach this critical mass, and for those that do, it is usually hard to separate them from other isotopes of the same element which are less radioactive since isotopes of the same element have nearly identical behavior.

UnbihexiumFan

2026-01-04 · comment #503

On the contrary, kabooming can also happen as a result of chemical processes. For example, heating plutonium at high temperatures causes it to spontaneously combust. However, if you have an INCREDIBLY UNSTABLE ISOTOPE of plutonium instead of a mildly unstable isotope, it will decay into something like uranium, which I'm pretty sure doesn't burn at high temperatures the same way plutonium does (though it probably still burns, just not as readily). So, a more stable isotope of plutonium (e.g. plutonium-244) would actually kaboom more under this environment than a less stable one (e.g. plutonium-239).

Thus, in some cases, stable isotopes kaboom more than unstable ones.

UnbihexiumFan

2026-01-04 · comment #504

Maybe I should get a life instead of writing messages like this

Blueberry_142857

2026-01-01 · comment #462

16/11, no notes

You need to login to post comments and replies.